What makes us different from every other GEO agency
Three things: we came up in RevOps, we do the primary research the category runs on, and we teach your team as we go.
We measure it to revenue
We came out of marketing ops and RevOps. So we don’t stop at a citation screenshot. We’ll track an AI referral through the funnel and build the Salesforce campaign architecture to report ROI on it.
No other GEO agency will do that, because no other GEO agency knows how.
We're the ones writing the playbook
Our CSO Andrea Lechner-Becker publishes the GEO/AEO Newsletter and our State of GEO in B2B research. When the category needs a source, this is where it comes from.
GEO changes monthly. Half this job is tracking what changed, deciding whether it matters to you, and handing your team something they can act on this week.
Working sessions and briefings are in every retainer. Your team gets smarter, not just your pages.
The work
Citations come from five places. Your website is only one of them.
LLMs read your site, then verify it against the rest of the web. Here’s what we run, what we advise on, and what we won’t pretend to do.
Website & content
Answer-first restructuring, question-format headings, schema, machine-readable pages. We write and update the content, not just brief it.
Community platforms
Reddit and forum strategy: which threads matter, what to say, what to prioritize. We draft. Your people post.
Video & YouTube
Titles, descriptions, chapters, transcripts, and the editing. Built so the content is retrievable, not just watchable.
Peer review
G2, Gartner Peer Insights, TrustRadius. Review velocity, category placement, and the profile copy models lift into comparisons.
LinkedIn
Newsletter strategy, post drafting, hashtags, distribution timing, thought leader versus company page, and how to use video.
What we don't do
We don’t have Reddit accounts to post on your behalf, and we won’t pose as your customers. We don’t run analyst relations.
When an agency says they “do off-site work,” ask who pushes the button. If the answer is a persona farm, that’s a liability sitting on your brand.
Two or three quarterly targets, chosen deliberately
Execution
Month 2 onward
Published work. Pages, video, community, review profiles
Reporting
Monthly
Numbers first, then the argument about next month
Reset
Every 90 days
New goals, re-prioritized roadmap, prompt set reviewed in the open
Pick two or three goals a quarter. Not seven.
AI visibility growth
Citation coverage
Competitive share of voice
AI referral traffic
Conversion lift
Answer accuracy
Sentiment rebalancing
Timeline
How long does GEO take to work?
Technical wins land in 60 days. Citation share on the clusters you chose moves in 90. Pipeline attribution takes a full sales cycle, which for most B2B is two quarters.
Lever
Time to visible change
How it's measured
Crawler access and technical fixes
60 days
Citations appearing where they previously didn’t
Page-level restructuring
60 to 90 days
Grounding query citation share
Off-site surface presence
90 to 120 days
Source-level citation inventory
Sentiment and accuracy
Two quarters or more
Answer audits against a frozen prompt set
Pipeline attribution
One to two sales cycles
CRM, with campaign architecture we build
5 → 41
Free trial completions went from 5 in a quarter to 41 per month.
11x
Click-through delta on optimized pages versus pages we hadn’t touched.
Ahead of Pella
A regional window installer beat a national brand in Google AI Overviews. Read the case study.
The biggest variance between clients isn’t industry or site size. It’s publishing velocity.
Measurement
How do you measure GEO?
Four layers: citation share, referral traffic, pipeline sourced, and answer accuracy. The pipeline layer is the one most agencies skip.
Salesforce or HubSpot campaign architecture we build
Revenue impact, not vibes
Answer accuracy
Frozen prompt set audits
Whether models describe you correctly
We use Semrush AIO, Adobe Brand Visibility, Profound, and Rankshift for tracking, AirOps for content workflow, and we work inside whatever your team already owns. We don’t mark up licenses.
Packages
How do you scope and price GEO work?
Three structures. Most clients start with the audit and roll into a retainer.
AI visibility audit
$1,000
Fixed bid. Four weeks. Where everyone starts.
Buyer-built prompt set across discovery, comparison, and diagnostic intent
What moves the price: prompt set size, number of domains, buyer segments, and content production volume. Volume is the biggest variable by a wide margin. Time and materials available for discrete builds like a migration or a full schema rollout.
Your side of the table
What does GNW need from your team?
Publishing speed, expert access, and one named owner. All three are on your side.
What we need
What happens without it
Publishing inside a week
Six-week approval cycles spend the retainer waiting
Two hours of expert time a month
Content that reads like everyone else’s
One named internal owner
Work stalls between departments
System access
No baseline, no proof
A model can produce the consensus view of your category in four seconds. It can’t produce what your implementation lead learned in a bad rollout.
Fit
Who is this right for, and who is it wrong for?
Right for B2B companies with product-market fit and something true to say.
A good fit
Product-market fit, settled positioning, and a category buyers already ask about
Real expertise, published or not. If you’ve already published it and it isn’t getting cited, that’s an even better fit
Ops or RevOps complexity, because that’s where we can prove revenue instead of citations
Someone internally who can approve a page this week
Not a fit, and what to do instead
Still hunting for product-market fit. GEO will only help models describe your confusion more efficiently.
You want volume content. Citations come from a point of view, and that doesn’t mass-produce.
You want an agency that agrees with you. Hire one that does.
You just want a dashboard. Buy a tool. Several are good and all are cheaper than we are.
If we’re not a fit, we’ll say so on the first call and we won’t charge you for it.
Generative engine optimization is the practice of getting your company cited in AI-generated answers from tools like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude, and Microsoft Copilot. The unit of work is a question, not a keyword.
Most practitioners use them interchangeably. AEO emphasizes extractable answers on your own pages. GEO includes the off-site sources models use to verify what they found there. You need both.
No. The technical foundation overlaps, but ranking first doesn’t reliably win the citation. Query fanout coverage, prompt-level tracking, and off-site source weighting have no SEO equivalent.
Some can. Most are selling the same audit with new vocabulary. Ask them what a grounding query is, and ask them to show you citation share instead of a rankings report.
An AI visibility audit is $1,000. The 90-day growth program is $10,000. Ongoing retainers start at $7,500 per month, driven mostly by content production volume.
No. We build the strategy, tell you which threads matter, and draft what to say. Your people post it. We don’t keep accounts to post on your behalf and we won’t pose as your customers.
That’s the point of our RevOps background. We instrument AI referrals and build the campaign architecture in Salesforce or HubSpot so pipeline from AI answers shows up in the same reporting as everything else.
ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews and Gemini, Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot, and Claude. Google AI Overviews rewards tight extractable answers. ChatGPT and Perplexity reward a connected body of point of view.
Find out how GNW can get you cited in AI answers.
Tell LEO what you’re working on. We’ll take it from there.